Assessment

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1073191107311261v1
15/2/177    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanheule, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fontaine, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vanheule, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fontaine, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
First published on January 8, 2008, doi:10.1177/1073191107311261

Assessment 2008;15:177.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008

Article

The Factor Structure of the Beck Depression Inventory–II: An Evaluation

Stijn Vanheule*, Mattias Desmet, Hans Groenvynck, Yves Rosseel, and Johnny Fontaine

Ghent University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Stijn.Vanheule{at}Ugent.be.


  Abstract
The Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II) is a frequently used scale for measuring depressive severity. BDI-II data (404 clinical; 695 nonclinical adults) were analyzed by means of confirmatory factor analysis to test whether the factor structure model with a somatic-affective and cognitive component of depression, formulated by Beck and colleagues, has a good fit. We also evaluated 10 alternative models. The fit of Beck’s model was not good for all criteria. Three of the alternative models had a better fit in both samples, but none of these met all criteria for good fit. Of the alternatives with a better fit, we selected the only model with unidimensional subscales, which assesses a somatic, affective, and cognitive dimension. For this model, which we recommend, as well as for Beck’ original model, a good fitting structure containing 15 and 16 items was developed with an item-deletion algorithm.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Koenigs, E. D. Huey, M. Calamia, V. Raymont, D. Tranel, and J. Grafman
Distinct Regions of Prefrontal Cortex Mediate Resistance and Vulnerability to Depression
J. Neurosci., November 19, 2008; 28(47): 12341 - 12348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]