Assessment

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vitacco, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Neumann, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vitacco, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Neumann, C. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Assessment, Vol. 10, No. 2, 143-150 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1073191103010002005

The Antisocial Process Screening Device

An Examination of its Construct and Criterion-Related Validity

Michael J. Vitacco

University of North Texas University of Massachusetts Medical School

Richard Rogers

University of North Texas

Craig S. Neumann

University of North Texas

The clinical assessment of psychopathy in adulthood is well established via programmatic research. More recently, psychopathy has been extended to children and adolescents with correlates to maladaptive personality traits, violent behavior, and noncompliance with institutional rules. To screen for adolescent psychopathy, the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) was developed as a 20-item self-report measure of psychopathy. The original validation of the APSD was limited to samples of clinic-referred and community-based children. In extending this research to delinquent populations, the current article uses two separate samples of adolescent offenders incarcerated in a maximum security facility (n = 78) and a local juvenile detention facility (n = 77). As evidence of criterion-related validity, the APSD was compared with two versions of the Psychopathy Checklist that yielded mixed results. Construct validity was examined via a confirmatory factor analysis that provided support for a three-factor model of the APSD.

Key Words: psychopathy • antisocial behavior • screening • adolescent offenders


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
M. G. Vaughn, C. E. Newhill, M. DeLisi, K. M. Beaver, and M. O. Howard
An Investigation of Psychopathic Features Among Delinquent Girls: Violence, Theft, and Drug Abuse
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, July 1, 2008; 6(3): 240 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
M. T. Boccaccini, M. Epstein, N. Poythress, K. S. Douglas, J. Campbell, G. Gardner, and D. Falkenbach
Self-Report Measures of Child and Adolescent Psychopathy as Predictors of Offending in Four Samples of Justice-Involved Youth
Assessment, December 1, 2007; 14(4): 361 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
C. M. Weaver, R. G. Meyer, J. J. Van Nort, and L. Tristan
Two-, Three-, and Four-Factor PCL-R Models in Applied Sex Offender Risk Assessments.
Assessment, June 1, 2006; 13(2): 208 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
L. L. Thompson, E. A. Whitmore, K. M. Raymond, and T. J. Crowley
Measuring Impulsivity in Adolescents With Serious Substance and Conduct Problems
Assessment, March 1, 2006; 13(1): 3 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
N. G. Poythress, K. S. Douglas, D. Falkenbach, K. Cruise, Z. Lee, D. C. Murrie, and M. Vitacco
Internal Consistency Reliability of the Self-Report Antisocial Process Screening Device
Assessment, March 1, 2006; 13(1): 107 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
N. G. Poythress, R. Dembo, J. Wareham, and P. E. Greenbaum
Construct Validity of the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory (YPI) and the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) With Justice-Involved Adolescents
Criminal Justice and Behavior, February 1, 2006; 33(1): 26 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
M. J. Vitacco, R. Rogers, C. S. Neumann, K. S. Harrison, and G. Vincent
A Comparison of Factor Models on the PCL-R With Mentally Disordered Offenders: The Development of a Four-Factor Model
Criminal Justice and Behavior, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 526 - 545.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
S. D. Benning, C. J. Patrick, R. T. Salekin, and A.-M. R. Leistico
Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Psychopathy Factors Assessed Via Self-Report: A Comparison of Three Instruments
Assessment, September 1, 2005; 12(3): 270 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
M. G. Vaughn and M. O. Howard
Self-Report Measures of Juvenile Psychopathic Personality Traits: A Comparative Review
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, January 1, 2005; 13(3): 152 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]